Base de dados e chaves electrónicas (ekeys): ferramentas úteis no diagnóstico e identificação de nemátodes fitoparasitas

Com o desenvolvimento das tecnologias de computação, o acesso à informação digital nos diversos domínios científicos tem revolucionado e facilitado a obtenção e utilização rápida de dados biológicos. Nos últimos anos, várias bases de dados (catálogos electrónicos) têm sido desenvolvidas, servindo de portal à biodiversidade existente em diversas áreas do globo (ex. Fauna Europaea, Tree of Life). Este tipo de informação permite a manutenção e a catalogação da biodiversidade existente a nível global; particularmente a biodiversidade de florestas, áreas cultivadas, ecossistemas aquáticos, bem como de espécies exóticas/invasivas encontradas nos diversos ecossistemas. Em 1999, foi detectada pela primeira vez, em Portugal e na Europa, o nemátode da madeira do pinheiro (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, espécie de quarentena e classificada como A1 pela EPPO), associado ao pinheiro bravo (Pinus pinaster). Na sequência deste trabalho foram desenvolvidas diversas bases de dados, nomeadamente para as espécies do género Bursaphelenchus e outros géneros com espécies de elevado interesse económico (Aphelenchoides, Dolichodorus); bem como para outros grupos de espécies com especial interesse biológico (Laimaphelenchus, Parasitaphelenchus). A reunião deste tipo de informação possibilita a construção de matrizes, e a determinação dos caracteres diagnósticos mais importantes para a identificação das espécies, posteriormente utilizados na elaboração de chaves electrónicas politómicas (com base no sistema PICKEY, Dianov & Lobanov). A utilização e versatilidade deste sistema, nomeadamente para o diagnóstico e a identificação de nemátodes fitoparasitas de elevado interesse económico, é demonstrada como exemplo

Computerized key of the genus genus Laimaphelenchus Fuchs, 1937

The Order Aphelenchida contains several genera of economic importance, namely Aphelenchoides and Bursaphelenchus. Nematode species belonging to these 2 genera frequently co-habit with other genera such as Laimaphelenchus. It is therefore important to clearly distinguish them, as well as understand the group´s biodiversity. A computerized, or e-key, for the genus Laimaphelenchus Fuchs has been developed in the BiKey Identification system (Dianov & Lobanov, 1996-2004). The e-key includes 14 species and 34 characters (from 2 to 6 character states each). It also includes the built-in algorithm ranging characters according their diagnostic values to minimize the number of the diagnosis steps (average number of steps is 2.7; values are re-calculated at each step). The most important characters (as calculated by BiKey) are: length of posterior branch of the female genital system; excretory pore position; vulval anterior flap shape; number pairs of mail tale papillae; male bursa shape (ventral view); number of tail tip setae in female; female tail tip stub shape; presence of mucro on tail tip in male. Key is pictorial (image-operating), multientry, as other BiKey products.

A synopsis of the genus Bursaphelenchus Fuchs, 1937 (Aphelenchida: Parasitaphelenchidae) with keys to species

The 75 valid species of the genus Bursaphelenchus are listed together with their synonyms. Diagnostic characters and their states are discussed and illustrated. Tabular and traditional text keys are provided for the genus. Two new subspecies are proposed to distinguish populations of B. piniperdae and B. poligraphi, as described by Rühm (1956), from the original descriptions of these species published by Fuchs (1937). Known records of Bursaphelenchus species with their associated natural vectors, plants and plant families are given. Dendrograms of species relationships (UPGMA, standard distance: mean character difference) based on combined taxonomic characters and also on spicule characters only, are provided. Discussion as to whether the species groups are natural or artificial (and therefore purely diagnostic) is based on their relationships in the dendrogram and the vector and associated plant ranges of the species. Of the six species groups distinguished, two appear to represent natural assemblages, these being the xylophilus-group (with ten species) and the hunti-group (seven species), of which two, B. cocophilus and B. dongguanensis, form the cocophilus-cluster which is separated on the dendrogram from the main clusters. The remaining four species groups appear to be artificial and purely diagnostic in function, namely the aberrans-group (four species); the eidmanni-group (six species); the borealis-group (five species), and the piniperdae-group (43 species). Two new subspecies, both in the piniperdae-group, viz. B. piniperdae ruehmpiniperdae n. subsp. and B. poligraphi ruehmpoligraphi n. subsp., are proposed and diagnosed from B. piniperdae piniperdae and B. poligraphi poligraphi the respective type subspecies. Bursaphelenchus dongguanensis is regarded as being a valid member of the genus and its transfer to Parasitaphelenchus is rejected.